L. Tobing, Septian Jonathan Wiliam (2024) Analisissistem Perawatan Cylinder Bucket Excavatorkomatsu PC-200 Dengan Menggunakan Metode Total Productive Maintenance (TPM). Other thesis, Politeknik Negeri Bengkalis.
![[thumbnail of Abstract]](https://eprints.polbeng.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
1. SKRIPSI-21204201245-Abstract.pdf - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike.
Download (28kB)
![[thumbnail of Bab I Pendahuluan]](https://eprints.polbeng.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
2. SKRIPSI-21204201245-Bab 1 Pendahuluan.pdf - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike.
Download (72kB)
![[thumbnail of Daftar Pustaka]](https://eprints.polbeng.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
3. SKRIPSI-21204201245-Daftar Pustaka.pdf - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike.
Download (63kB)
![[thumbnail of Full Text]](https://eprints.polbeng.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
4. SKRIPSI-21204201245-Full Text.pdf - Submitted Version
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike.
Download (8MB) | Request a copy
Abstract
This study aim toaims to perform maintenance on the Cylinder Bucket Excavator Pc-200 using the Total Method Productive Maintatenance (TPM) at PT. Vadhana International, located at Kulim, km. 08, Duri, Riau. Cylinder Bucket is one of the most important components in the Front Attachment Excavator.
This research includes data collection, data processing, and analysis using the total productive maintenance (TPM) method. With the calculation of the Availability Method, the calculation results from April-June are around 83.00% -87.00%, the Performance Efficiency Method, the calculation results from April-June are around 72.00% -75.00%, the Rate Off method for quality products from April-June is around 81.41% -74.76%, from the calculation of the results of Availability, Performance Efficiency, and Rate Off Quality Products are combined and totaled using the calculation method of Overall Equipment Effectiveness and the results of the calculation of the percentage value of the 3 calculation methods can be concluded that the results have not met the standards of the world class standard, namely: 85.00%.